On 2019-07-05 19:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 2019-07-05 01:33, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> I just saw this proposal. The undefined behavior in question is strictly
>>> academic. These changes do remove the need for new users to discover
>>> -fno-sanitize=nonnull-attribute, but they make the code longer and no clearer.
>>> Given the variety of code this touches, I expect future commits will
>>> reintroduce the complained-of usage patterns, prompting yet more commits to
>>> restore the invariant achieved here. Hence, I'm -0 for this change.
>
>> This sanitizer has found real problems in the past. By removing these
>> trivial issues we can then set up a build farm animal or similar to
>> automatically check for any new issues.
>
> I think Noah's point is just that we can do that with the addition of
> -fno-sanitize=nonnull-attribute. I agree with him that it's very
> unclear why we should bother to make the code clean against that
> specific subset of warnings.
OK, I'm withdrawing this patch.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
