Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Date
Msg-id 1f234633a20ec2544696fac9a4de013d7c7406ff.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2020-03-28 at 19:21 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> Thank you.  Pushed.

Thanks for your efforts on this, and thanks for working on the fallout.

How can it be that even after an explicit VACUUM, this patch can cause
unstable regression test results?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Creating a database with a non-predefined collation