what would that mean?
It´s all SQL, so what else is to be supported? Maybe shp2pgsql too? (i
don´t see why, pgAdmin supports output to file (CSV) now, but no
matching function backwards)
Or would it mean collaborating with uDig (run by refractions btw), to
provide a complete gis viewing experience? Sounds like that would only
complicate things needlessly.
Is anybody else out there interested in PostGIS support for pgAdmin?
And finally, would it be possible for us to create an add-on to
pgAdmin ourselves and share it w/ the world? (e.g. the one i
proposed). That is, without introducing upgrade possibilities.
Cheers,
WBL
On Nov 15, 2007 5:57 PM, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> > I mean, would it be technically possible.
> > It might be possible for us to provide funding if it is.
> >
> > On Nov 13, 2007 2:49 PM, Willy-Bas Loos <willybas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> One function that we would love to see in pgAdmin would be a wrapper
> >> for pgsql2shp, so that you can export queries to a shapefile directly.
> >> Would that be possible?
>
> It's possible, but we don't tend to add arbitrary functionality for
> add-ons. If we look to support postgis, we need to do it fully.
>
> Regard,s Dave
>
