Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 1d9cb989-91b0-919e-f42b-4788f5fc7911@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05.10.22 20:57, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 07:55:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Leaving archive_command empty is an intentional configuration choice.
>>
>> What we are talking about here is, arguably, a misconfiguration, so it
>> should result in an error.
> 
> Okay.  What do you think about something like the attached?

That looks like the right solution to me.

Let's put that into PG 16, and maybe we can consider backpatching it.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unnecessary commas for goto labels