Re: data loss with pg_standby when doing a controlled failover - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: data loss with pg_standby when doing a controlled failover
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10904060651m18049be5qae1d09a42904d18b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to data loss with pg_standby when doing a controlled failover  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: data loss with pg_standby when doing a controlled failover
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> wrote:
> IMHO this should be mentioned in the docs explicitly (I find it quite
> surprising that data can be lost even if the system is shutdown
> correctly), or better when shutting down the postmaster should spit all
> log segments containing all changes when archiving is on so the warm
> standby server can catch up.

See also this thread which might be interesting for you:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0903242329j12865d55s348f5c873a956e71@mail.gmail.com

--
Guillaume

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: data loss with pg_standby when doing a controlled failover
Next
From: "Ondrej Novy"
Date:
Subject: BUG #4750: UPDATE called from PL/pgSQL failed when there is ON UPDATE DO INSTEAD NOTHING rule