On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hm. People have complained of that fact from time to time in normal
> usage as well. Should we simply change SIGINT handling to allow it to
> cancel an idle transaction?
If this means that we would be able to able to easily rollback the
current transaction of a backend stuck in "idle in transaction"
status, a big +1.
--
Guillaume
