Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10811261259w339e04b8ib895e8caca990add@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, the *first* sentence there says it "resets the session to its
> initial state", so it seems to me the intent is clear.  But maybe we
> should alter the second sentence to read, say, "This _currently_ has the
> same effect as ...", thereby making it clear that this is implementation
> detail and not the controlling definition.

+1.

-- 
Guillaume


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks
Next
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1