Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10804011735h4083d06bv693f2fd2cd9cd1e1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
>  I'm not sure if all of those changes are net positive for PostgreSQL
>  though, they weren't last time I played with this.

I fixed most of the bugs of JDBCBench I found when I benchmarked
Sequoia a long time ago. Totally forgot about it. I'll see if I can
find the sources somewhere.

--
Guillaume

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work