Re: like/ilike improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: like/ilike improvements
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10705221038k498a6ccfn3533262cfdcb5ba7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to like/ilike improvements  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: like/ilike improvements  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/22/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> But before I commit this I'd appreciate seeing some more testing, both
> for correctness and performance.

Any chance the patch applies cleanly on a 8.2 code base? I can test it
on a real life 8.2 db but I won't have the time to load the data in a
CVS HEAD one.
If there is no obvious reason for it to fail on 8.2, I'll try to see
if I can apply it.

Thanks.

--
Guillaume


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server
Next
From: Andrew - Supernews
Date:
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements