On 8/29/06, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Good point. I thought it was clear enough, but obviously not. I had a
> similar case with bind, and used a comma to separate them:
>
> LOG: statement: prepare sel1, SELECT $1;
> LOG: statement: bind sel1, $1 = 'a''b'
For this one, I must admit I prefer the colon we used before.
Something like:
LOG: statement: prepare sel1: SELECT $1;
LOG: statement: bind sel1: $1 = 'a''b'
seems better to me as after the colon, we have the details of the
command which is the common sense of a colon.
> I am concerned a dash isn't clear enough, and a semicolon is confusing.
> Using a comma the new output is:
>
> LOG: duration: 0.023 ms execute sel1
> DETAIL: prepare: SELECT $1;, bind: $1 = 'a''b'
A dash is clearer in this case IMHO. ;, is not very readable. But I
can parse easily both forms so it's not a problem for me if you prefer
a comma.
> Is that OK? Patch attached and committed. I also fixed the null bind
> parameter bug. It now displays $1 = NULL (no quotes used).
Cool. I'll test that.
> Other suggestions?
I'll compile this new version and make tests in the next few days to
check everything is consistent and let you know.
I'm still struggling to find a regexp good enough to parse "statement:
execute y ('a', 4, 'text, with a comma'::text);" :).
Thanks a lot for your work on this subject. It will help us a lot when
we use the JDBC driver.
--
Guillaume
