Re: - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris Hoover
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id 1d219a6f0608031229r15868fb4p37ba030c591a25e1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to  (Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-performance
I've got 226 customer databases in one cluster.  Works like a champ with 8.1.3.  I have 3 additional PostgreSQL servers with our largest customers on them.  They have between 10 and 30 databases.  The smallest of my servers has 261GB's worth of db's in the cluster, and the largest is 400GB's.

BTW, our application is an asp application also.

Just some fun numbers for you.

Chris

P.S.

Thanks to all of the PostgreSQL developers for the great work and for providing the awesome support.

On 8/3/06, Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
I'm at a client who's an ASP; they've written their app such that each
customer gets their own database. Rigth now they're at nearly 200
databases, and were thinking that they "must be the largest PostgreSQL
install in the world". :) After taking them down a notch or two, I
started wondering how many sites could beat 200 databases in a single
cluster. I'm sure there's any number that can, though 200 databases in a
cluster certainly isn't mainstream.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com     work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson"
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: "Milen Kulev"
Date:
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing