Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Lakhin
Subject Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
Date
Msg-id 1cec7fb9-e7ac-8523-06fd-60b25c9a7b7d@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Bertrand,

09.05.2024 15:20, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Oh I see, your test updates an existing dependency. v4 took care about brand new
> dependencies creation (recordMultipleDependencies()) but forgot to take care
> about changing an existing dependency (which is done in another code path:
> changeDependencyFor()).
>
> Please find attached v5 that adds:
>
> - a call to the new depLockAndCheckObject() function in changeDependencyFor().
> - a test when altering an existing dependency.
>
> With v5 applied, I don't see the issue anymore.

Me too. Thank you for the improved version!
I will test the patch in the background, but for now I see no other
issues with it.

Best regards,
Alexander



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: elog/ereport VS misleading backtrace_function function address
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR