On 05.12.25 15:46, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> Calling copyObject fails in C++ with an error like in most setups:
>
> error: use of undeclared identifier 'typeof'; did you mean 'typeid'
>
> This is due to the C compiler supporting used to compile postgres
> supporting typeof, but that function actually not being present in the
> C++ compiler. This fixes that by using decltype instead of typeof when
> including the header in C++.
>
> Realized because of Thomas' not about how much of our headers should
> work in C++, and remembering I hit this specific problem myself.
>
> Another approach would be to force the value of HAVE_TYPEOF to 0 if __cplusplus.
In the long run, I would like to change copyObject() to use
typeof_unqual instead, because that handles qualifiers more correctly.
(Currently, copyObject() of a const-qualified pointer results in a
const-qualified pointer, which is nonsensical because the reason you
made the copy is that you can modify it.) See attached patch for an
example. Does C++ have something that is semantically similar to that?
