Re: is_superuser is not documented - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: is_superuser is not documented
Date
Msg-id 1ae53ec3-5c32-7196-59cb-568640c01a2c@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: is_superuser is not documented  (Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: is_superuser is not documented
List pgsql-hackers

On 2023/04/01 22:34, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> The patch updated the guc table for is_superuser in
> src/backend/utils/misc/guc_tables.c

Yes, this patch moves the descriptions of is_superuser to config.sgml
and changes its group to PRESET_OPTIONS.

> However, when I look at the code on master I don't see this update

Yes, the patch has not been committed yet because of lack of review comments.
Do you have any review comments on this patch?
Or you think it's ready for committer?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode