On 2019-04-25 02:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Is there something else you are considering for this patch? This
> previous suggestion looks fine to live with, at least for me. Tom,
> perhaps you have some extra input on the matter and would prefer a
> more restrictive location for the CCI?
I didn't find that solution very principled either. I now think the
best fix is to have a CCI at the end of standard_ProcessUtility(). It's
very possible that other commands could also create catalog entries that
some on-commit action would like to see. It wouldn't be sensible to
chase down each command separately.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
