Re: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters
Date
Msg-id 1a212360-8665-1f3a-b74d-0cabe543729c@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters  (Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>)
Responses Re: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters  (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Nikita,

On 2/28/18 9:46 AM, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> В письме от 28 февраля 2018 00:46:36 пользователь Nikita Glukhov написал:
> 
>> I would like to present patch set implementing opclass parameters.
>>
>> This feature was recently presented at pgconf.ru:
>> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/opclass_pgconf.ru-2018.pdf
>>
>> A analogous work was already done by Nikolay Shaplov two years ago:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5213596.TqFRiqmCTe%40nataraj-amd64
>> But this patches are not based on it, although they are very similar.
> 
> You know, I am still working on this issue.

This patch was submitted to the 2018-03 CF at the last moment with no
prior discussion or review as far as I can tell. It appears to be
non-trivial and therefore not a good fit for the last CF for PG11.

In addition, based on Nikolay's response, I think the patch should be
marked Returned with Feedback until it is reconciled with the existing
patches.

Any objects to marking this Returned with Feedback?  Or, I can move it
to the next CF as is.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication