Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 1a015f64-b485-3b06-aeb0-d7e1e53ff8d8@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/16/16 9:53 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> If that were the standard, we'd never have bumped the major version at
>> all, and would still be on 4.something (or whatever Berkeley was using
>> when they tossed it over the wall; I'm not too clear on whether there was
>> ever a 5.x release).
>
> I thought the idea was that Berkeley tossed an source tree over the
> wall with no version number and then the first five releases were
> Postgres95 0.x, Postgres95 1.0, Postgres95 1.0.1, Postgres95 1.0.2,
> Postgres95 1.0.9. Then the idea was that PostgreSQL 6.0 was the sixth
> major release counting those as the first five releases.

The last release out of Berkeley was 4.2.  Then Postgres95 was "5", and 
then PostgreSQL started at 6.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0