Re: meson "experimental"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: meson "experimental"?
Date
Msg-id 1F86A227-9FDF-41CA-96AD-96E7C18E51C8@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson "experimental"?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: meson "experimental"?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On May 30, 2024 8:03:33 AM PDT, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:32 AM Aleksander Alekseev <
>aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> By a quick look on the buildfarm we seem to use Ninja >= 1.11.1.
>> However since Meson can use both Ninja and VS as a backend I'm not
>> certain which section would be most appropriate for naming the minimal
>> required version of Ninja.
>>
>>
>When I tried building with the VS backend it blew up, I don't recall the
>details. I think we should just use ninja everywhere. That keeps things
>simple.

VS should work, and if not, we should fix it. It's slow, so I'd not use it for scheduled builds, but for people
developingusing visual studio.  

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: meson and check-tests