Re: another query optimization question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Teran
Subject Re: another query optimization question
Date
Msg-id 1DABF561-5432-11D8-84ED-000A95A6F0DC@cluster9.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: another query optimization question  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

> I'm not sure ... I thought I ran it on my P4 here in the office and
> saw it
> too, albeit not near as frequently ... but, in FreeBSD's case, it is a
> "design issue" ... there are two different functions, once that is
> kinda
> fuzzy (but fast), and the other that is designed to be exact, but at a
> performance loss ... or was it the same function, but a 'sysctl'
> variable
> that changes the state?
>
> Can't remember which, but it is by design on FreeBSD ... and, if we're
> talking about Apple, the same most likely applies, as its based on the
> same kernel ...
>
> Back of my mind, I *think* it was these sysctl variables:
>
> kern.timecounter.method: 0
> kern.timecounter.hardware: i8254
>
I will try to check this on my system.

But here another hint, maybe more interesting for Apple though: The bug
does -not- occur if another process uses a lot of CPU time. We encoded
a quicktime movie into mpeg2 and while this was using about 90% and
while encoding the vcd i wanted to show the bug to a friend and it did
not work.

But besides this, is there any chance that we can optimize our initial
performance problem ;-)

regards David


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: another query optimization question
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: views?