> On 19 Mar 2026, at 10:55, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't pg_hosts.conf a really (too) generic name for this
>> feature?
>
> My question earlier about a different key=value format (json5?), was
> related to this, but approached it from a different direction: maybe
> it could be more generic in the future, supporting different settings,
> maybe even in an extensible way? With the current SNI handling already
> relates to multi tenancy, and allowing custom per hosts settings would
> move in the same direction.
Introducing a new config format is for sure an interesting idea, but it's a
much bigger body of work which needs it's own discussion and patchset, it
should not be as part of another feature.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
