> On 16 Mar 2016, at 18:04, Evgeniy Shishkin <itparanoia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 Mar 2016, at 17:52, Evgeniy Shishkin <itparanoia@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 16 Mar 2016, at 16:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes:
>>>> 1. Why isnt' folder_id part of the index-cond?
>>>
>>> Because a GIN index is useless for sorting.
>>
>> I don't see how gin inability to return sorted data relates to index condition.
>> In fact i tried to reproduce the example,
>> and if i change folder_id to int from bigint, then index condition with folder_id is used
>>
>> Index Cond: ((fts_all @@ '''hi'''::tsquery) AND (folder_id = 1))
>>
>
> Looks like documentation http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/btree-gin.html
> is lying about supporting int8 type
>
Uh, it works if i cast to bigint explicitly
WHERE del.fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple', 'hi')
AND del.folder_id = 1::bigint;
results in
Index Cond: ((folder_id = '1'::bigint) AND (fts_all @@ '''hi'''::tsquery))
>>
>>>
>>>> 2. Is there a way to make it use the (same) index to sort by
>>>> received_timestamp?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>> 3. Using a GIN-index, is there a way to use the index at all for sorting?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>> 4. It doesn't seem like ts_rank uses the index for sorting either.
>>>
>>> Same reason.
>>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
