RE: RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Peter Mount
Subject RE: RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem
Date
Msg-id 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B64D@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to JDBC Timestamp Problem  (yves@asua.vlaanderen.net)
List pgsql-interfaces
Yes, about 1-2 months ago ;-) The current CVS has the patch applied.

As soon as I get the domain problems sorted, I'm going to tripple check
Timestamp as I'd like to see the next release without the timestamp bug
reappearing...

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount@maidstone.gov.uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Kachnowich [mailto:khkachn@madweed.ncsc.mil]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 5:30 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces
> Subject: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem
> 
> 
> I ran into a Timestamp problem a while back. The Postgres back end
> seems to return 2 digits for the milliseconds when the JDBC 
> is expecting
> 
> 3 digits (and 3 digits is correct).
> 
> I am not sure if this has already been fixed or reported or even if it
> is the
> real problem at all.
> 
> Does anyone know where I could checked to see if a patch is availalbe
> for this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> 


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Joachim Achtzehnter
Date:
Subject: RE: JDBC Drop/Create problem?
Next
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: JDBC Drop/Create problem?