Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count
Date
Msg-id 1ACF45F0-3049-44DE-96E7-FA532CB5CD54@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 7 Mar 2023, at 09:26, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:

> Right, what I meant was: can a pg_regress sql/expected test drive a psql
> interactive prompt?  Your comments suggested using password.sql so I was
> curious if I was missing a neat trick for doing this.

The attached v7 adds a TAP test for verifying that \password use the changed
SCRAM iteration count setting, and dials back the other added test to use fewer
iterations than the default setting in order to shave (barely noticeable
amounts of) cpu cycles.

Running interactive tests against psql adds a fair bit of complexity and isn't
all that pleasing on the eye, but it can be cleaned up and refactored when
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4228/ is committed.

--
Daniel Gustafsson


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)