Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"
Date
Msg-id 19BF09AA-B8B1-4837-905E-F6EAABC3E2E2@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"  (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>)
Responses Re: Two questions about "pg_constraint"
List pgsql-general

> On Aug 25, 2022, at 21:43, Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com> wrote:
> [...]

I've read this a few times, and I am having trouble understanding what behavior you were expecting out of PostgreSQL,
andwhat behavior you received that you didn't think was correct.  If it is "pg_constraint has a column connamespace,
andthat appears to be a denormalization since a constraint is always in the same schema as the table it is owned by," I
believeTom explained the reason for that. 

If that's not what is concerning you, can you summarize it in a sentence two?




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: In a partition why 1st time encounter NULL then call minvfunc
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: In a partition why 1st time encounter NULL then call minvfunc