Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dan Gorman
Subject Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
Date
Msg-id 19AF7337-3F84-4753-AB6F-7193276C6F76@hi5.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Currently I have jumbo frames enabled on the NA and the switches and
also are using a the 32K R/W NFS options. Everything is gigE.

Regards,
Dan Gorman


On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Joe Conway wrote:

> Dan Gorman wrote:
>> That makes sense. Speaking of NetApp, we're using the 3050C with 4
>> FC  shelfs. Any generic advice other than the NetApp (their NFS
>> oracle  tuning options)
>> that might be useful? (e.g. turning off snapshots)
>
> I'm not sure if this is in the tuning advice you already have, but
> we use a dedicated gigabit interface to the NetApp, with jumbo (9K)
> frames, and an 8K NFS blocksize. We use this for both Oracle and
> Postgres when the database resides on NetApp.
>
> Joe



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: kah_hang_ang@toray.com.my
Date:
Subject: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql?
Next
From: "A. Kretschmer"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it possible to start two instances of postgresql?