> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > That will also be fixed.
> > >
> > > Do you mean to say the offending index will be auto-corrected on the fly? That
> > > would be almost as good as preventing the root cause in the first place...
> >
> > No, it just reports the index name. In 7.1, I think this problem will
> > go away, if not in 7.0.
>
> Is the problem well-understood? Is there a place where I can read up on it? This
> kind of instability is painful enough to get me thinking about trying to hack my
> distribution...
I believe it has to do with extra index tuples showing up in the index
that are not in the heap. When the count's don't match, the problem is
reported. I believe it only happens when the system crashes during an
index update. I think it is harmless. To fix it properly requires a
very sophisticated write-ahead log that is scheduled for 7.1 in about
six months.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
