Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...
Date
Msg-id 199911231740.MAA05444@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...  (Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh@mecomb.com>)
List pgsql-general
> At 01:18 AM 23-11-1999 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> If the priorities include stability and reliability, that's what you get.
> >> If the priorities are features at any cost, you get junk.
> >>
> >> Though Open Source projects are less susceptible to featuritis, they're far
> >> from immune. Trouble is many PHBs only compare stuff feature by brochure
> >> feature.
> >
> >We only do 2-3 major releases a year for a reason.  If it is not
> >reliable, it is useless.  This is not a computer game.
>
> Yep. Glad to hear that.

Read our development history on our web site.  It discusses this.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Next
From: ^chewie
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Socket file lock