Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date
Msg-id 199910040404.AAA09143@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison  (Martin Ramsch <m.ramsch@computer.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
List pgsql-general
> [I skipped the PHP3 list because there this discussion is even more
>  off-topic than here ...]
>
> On Sun 1999-10-03 22:30:44 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Second, the MySQL folks don't mention the features they _don't_ have,
> > except now they mention they don't have transactions.
>
> Well, maybe nobody told you, but see chapter "5.3 Functionality
> missing from MySQL" of the MySQL Reference Manual ...
> <URL: http://www.mysql.com/Manual_chapter/manual_Compatibility.html#Missing_functions >

Let me clarify.  I do mention MySQL specifically on the FAQ at:

    http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html

and it says:

    In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are slower on
    inserts/updates because we have transaction overhead. Of course, MySQL
    doesn't have any of the features mentioned in the Features section
    above. We are built for flexibility and features, though we continue to
    improve performance through profiling and source code analysis.

I am glad to listen to any comments about this statement.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison