Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Nat Howard
Subject Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0
Date
Msg-id 199909192338.TAA14108@spot.pupworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0
List pgsql-ports
>> Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance...
>
>6.5.2 should have allowed you to use either bison or yacc.  I am running
>bsdi 4.0, but have never fooled around with plpgsql.
>

Thanks for chiming in...

It otherwise seems to do fine (at least on the regression
tests), but it does fail the plpgsql regression test, and I need plpgsql.

I'm startled that you think that either bison or yacc would work.
Out of the box, every plpgsql invocation fails (and thus everything in
the plpgsql regression test) with the unresolved symbol error.

Does a virgin 6.5.2 install pass the plpgsql regression test on your
4.0 bsdi box?  Thanks.

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] plpgsql & bsdi 4.0