Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Date
Msg-id 199907301604.MAA29190@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha  (Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat@nag.cs.colorado.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > And I'll go one better: v6.5.x is not "dead", in the sense that Tom
> > Lane has been faithfully applying relevant patches for his fixes in
> > case a v6.5.2 is released. I'll guess that the Intel problems noted
> > with the main tree are not present in the v6.5.x tree, so any new
> > problems noted would be due to the upcoming Alpha patches.
>
>     So, if I understand this correctly, the snapshot available on the
> FTP site is from the unstable tree, and there is a "stable 6.5.x" tree
> that can only be access by cvs{up}? And that this stable tree should not
> have quite as much delta from 6.5.1 as the snapshots do? Or did I miss
> something?

Yes.  This is correct.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Stable vs Current (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha)