Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Date
Msg-id 199907291608.MAA15502@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-ports
> OK. Another tack would be to do what you suggest on the main tree, and
> then backpatch using diffs on the entire tree. Then we can release on
> the v6.5.x branch as we would have liked.

Why not just use the current tree.  What does backpatching the entire
tree do for us?

>
> I'll be happy to attempt the backpatching, and if I fail then we can
> proceed with a v6.5.2 release based on the main tree. But I'm more
> comfortable knowing that we've inspected every patch, and included
> only those which address something significant.

Oh, yes.  I see.  Good idea to just review the patches and see what is
involved.  It is actually pretty easy to do that in one big patch.

> Does this sound unrealistic? I'm guessing that the backpatching can
> happen fairly easily, but I don't understand why someone just reported
> 3.5MB of diffs. Hmm, how much of those diffs are on the docs tree? I
> did make a bunch of changes to get the man pages going, and they
> aren't relevant for v6.5.2 which could be limited to the src/ tree.

Don't know.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Next
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha