Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Peter Galbavy
Subject Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Date
Msg-id 19990723144644.A2819@office.knowledge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha  (Uncle George <gatgul@voicenet.com>)
List pgsql-ports
On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 07:26:03AM -0400, Uncle George wrote:
> Thanks,
>     But I think that a computer has no right to any "damn order" it
> wants to, particular if its the same src & test facilities.
> gat

Thomas' reply is quite correct. Unless you specify an order, the
underlying system (maybe not even postgresql, but the OS and libraries
it uses) may sort and return comparisons in any order, but always a
consistent order.

The fact that an i386 and an alpha processor based systems return
results differently should be of no suprise. You must explicitly
specify "ORDER BY xxx" in a query, and even then you need to know your
collation sequences etc.

Regards,
--
Peter Galbavy
Knowledge Matters Ltd
http://www.knowledge.com/

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Fernando Schapachnik
Date:
Subject: 6.5 not running on Solaris 2.5.1 SPARC
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] 6.5 not running on Solaris 2.5.1 SPARC