Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Date
Msg-id 199907201715.NAA29491@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
List pgsql-hackers
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> >> Maybe it is time to swallow hard and redesign the querytree
> >> representation?
> 
> > Well, while you do that keep in mind outer joins.
> 
> While *I* redesign it?  I barely know what an outer join is.
> 
> I'm happy to kibitz while someone else redesigns it, but I don't
> think I'm qualified to be the lead dog...

Did you want to do the change for UNION, or were you just suggesting it
be done?  I can easily add it to the TODO list.

Done:
* redesign UNION structures to have separarate target lists.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VERSION
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Counting bool flags in a complex query