Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Date
Msg-id 199906281830.OAA19695@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Oh, I didn't realize this.  We certainly should think about reducing the
> > time spent on it, though it is kind of lame to be testing numeric in a
> > precision that is less than the standard int4 type.
> 
>     We certainly should think about a general speedup of NUMERIC.

How would we do that?  I assumed it was already pretty optimized.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time