Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Date
Msg-id 199906140103.KAA28678@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture  ("Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>I reverted back the patch for include/storage/s_lock.h and seems
>>NetBSD/m68k port begins to work again.
>>
>>I think we should revert back the linux/m68k patches and leave them
>>for 6.5.1.  Objection?
>
>I would like to support linux/m68k, but on the Mac 68K platform the NetBSD
>folks are more numerous.  Unless linux outnumbers NetBSD on some 68k
>platforms other than Mac (and I think Amiga) I don't think you should break
>a (mostly) working port in order to support a less widely used one.

I think the change I made in s_lock.h should make both NetBSD/m68k and
Linux/m68k happy. Can some Linux/m68k folks confirm it?
--
Tatsuo Ishii

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Henry B. Hotz"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Beta5 == Tomorrow's Release ..