Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Kalchev
Subject Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem
Date
Msg-id 199906090804.LAA09263@dcave.digsys.bg
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

Sorry that I picked this too late in the release cycle, but other work
prevented my earlier involvement in the testing.

There are at least two serious problems that I discovered so far with Postgres
6.5 beta2 and beta3 (running on BSD/OS 4.0.1):

1. LIKE with indexes works worse than without indexes.

Given the following schema:

CREATE TABLE "words" (       "w_key" text,       "w_pages" text);
CREATE  INDEX "w_k_words_i" on "words" using btree ( "w_key" "text_ops" );

The table words has 117743 records.

the folowing query:

select w_key from words where w_key like 'sometext%'

is explained as:

Index Scan using w_k_words_i on words  (cost=3335.38 rows=1 width=12)

and runs for several minutes. If I drop the w_k_words_i index, the explain is:

Seq Scan on words  (cost=7609.52 rows=1 width=12)

and the query runs noticeably faster.

Under 6.4 the behavior is as expected, much better with indexes.

2. Under Postgres 6.4 the following query:

SELECT config.serviceid, custid, datetime_date( updated_at ) as date ,archived
as a, c.subserviceid as ss, c.usage_price as    price, c.usage_included as time, service
FROM  a, b, c
WHERE confid in ( SELECT confid            FROM a           WHERE archived_at > '30-04-1999'              AND
created_at< '30-04-1999' )    AND not archived        AND a.serviceid=b.serviceid     AND c.serviceid=a.serviceid 
GROUP BY custid, serviceid, subserviceid;

works, although runs for indefinitely long time (due to the subselect - but
this is not a problem, as it can be rewritten). Under Postgres 6.5 hwoever, it
is not accepted, because there are no aggregates in the target list. Is this
incorrect behavior of the 6.4.2 version or 6.5 has different syntax?

Regards,
Daniel Kalchev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: External functions/languages and transactions
Next
From: Daniel Kalchev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem