> > Sure there is: \%. Of course, defaulting to ESCAPE \ rather than no
> > escape is not standards-compliant either, but it's a lot closer than
> > inventing a meaning for %% ...
>
> OK.
But we have code in DoMatching that does %% to % already. Can we just
leave it alone and put it back. I promise to implement ESCAPE for 6.6.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
