Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Date
Msg-id 199906051814.OAA20833@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
List pgsql-hackers
> In short, if you load a bunch of tuples into a table, the first select
> after the load can run a lot slower than you might expect, because it'll
> be writing back most or all of the pages it touches.  But that penalty
> doesn't affect every select, only the first one to scan a newly-written
> tuple.

I have removed this from the TODO list:
* Prevent fsync in SELECT-only queries

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kaare Rasmussen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Outer joins
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6