> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
>
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right? Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist. HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
>
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?
Oops, that was me, today. Patch attached. This is not the time to be
adding new portability calls.
Comments on how to handle this?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026