Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Paul A Vixie
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Date
Msg-id 199810211721.KAA01043@bb.rc.vix.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I would think the CIDR type should preserve the /32.

Makes no difference.  If all four octets are specified and no "/" is given,
the "/32" is assumed.  Printing it would be nicer but not printing it is not
an error.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New INET and CIDR types