Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Date
Msg-id 199810140321.XAA15152@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind  (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
List pgsql-hackers
> This sounds bang-on to me.  How soon before your functions are in the
> tree?  I'll start modifying my code based on this but I won't send it
> in until I have tested it against your functions.

I have not seen any patch yet.  Paul, was your earlier posting supposed
to be applied?  If so, let me know.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ?