Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers
Date
Msg-id 199810080019.UAA16001@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers  (Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@nhh.no>)
List pgsql-hackers
Applied.

Thomas, did remove the README.ip, or did you leave it when you decided
to merge it into the docs.  I still show it here, so I am renaming it.



> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
>
> >     *Please* make the appropriate changes and submit a patch...it
> > should be listed as CIDR, not as IPADDR.  MACADDR, IMHO, is okay, as its
> > the only way I've ever heard of it being referred...but I do not consider
> > IPADDR to be correct terminology...
>
> I agree.  I think, though, that the best argument presented in the
> debate was from Paul Vixie, who wanted INET to be the name covering
> both IPV4 and IPV6.  The following kit makes the needed changes:
>
> WARNING!  This posting contains two separate patch kits, to be applied
> at different times, renaming a couple of files in between them!  The
> steps to be taken are marked with "[***]".
>
> [***] First apply these patches to change ipaddr to inet.  Affected files are:


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success