Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Date
Msg-id 199806271446.KAA20899@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Odd behavior in regression test?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Is it possible that the recent change from fork/exec to just fork leaves
> > the postmaster more exposed? I can imagine that it might, but don't have
> > any direct experience with it so am just guessing. Any other ideas? Do
> > people see this on other platforms? This is the first time I can recall
> > seeing the postmaster go away on a crash of a backend (but of course my
> > memory isn't what it should be :)
>
> My guess is that the postmaster can no longer restart its backends after
> one of them aborts.  Something I need to check into perhaps.
>

This is now fixed.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: binding table
Next
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] binding table