>
>
> I didn't realize PG could not do
>
> group by [function on column]
>
> Ouch!
>
> I *think* all the "real" RDBMS can do this. If Oracle and
> Sybase both support it, that makes it more or less a de facto
> standard :-) I'm sure we use this syntax in several places in
> our apps -- certainly in our time-series analysis package.
> Implication is that 6.3 is still not functional enough to
> replace an existing commercial SQL server such as Oracle or
> Sybase for production apps, without expensive manual proofing
> and rewriting of embedded SQL statements.
>
> Does anyone know whether this group by syntax is ANSI SQL92?
Added to TODO. Vadim may have a comment on this, and how hard it is to
do. I know we allow functional indexes, but am not sure how that
relates to this problem.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
