Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ulrich Voss
Subject Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
Date
Msg-id 199806051026.MAA05708@hex.de.uu.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
List pgsql-hackers
> Ulrich Voss writes:
> > > On Wed, 3 June 1998, at 16:38:43, Ulrich Voss wrote:
> > >
> > > > Massimo had a patch, which added the pid in the first field of the
> > > > debug output (and I guess a timestamp). So you can easily
> > > > sort/grep/trace the debug output.
> > >
> > > I'm looking for a little more than that.
> >
> > OK, but step  one is simple, Massimo's patch could possibly be
> > integrated in two or three hours. And it adds valuable debugging
> > info.
> >
> > (Btw., Massimo's patch was the first (and I hope last) very helpful
> > patch, which for obscure reasons never made into the official
> > distribution. And it had this simple pid/time patch (not in current
> > cvs), it had a spinlock patch (not in current cvs), a better deadlock
>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Well, uhmmm, yes there is a spinlock patch in the current CVS. Please look
> again.

Sorry. I meant in the current stable release ...

> Btw, I am about to update the spinlock patch based on some testing I did to
> resolve some of Bruce Momjians performance concerns. I will post the results
> of the testing (which are quite interesting if you are a performance fanatic)
> later today, and the patch this weekend.
>
> -dg
I hope a patch for 6.3.2 will make its way someday ...

Ciao

Ulrich




Ulrich Voss                            \ \   / /__  / ___|__ _| |
VoCal web publishing                    \ \ / / _ \| |   / _` | |
voss@vocalweb.de                         \ V / (_) | |__| (_| | |
http://www.vocalweb.de                    \_/ \___/ \____\__,_|_|
Tel: (++49) 203-306-1560                           web publishing

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Zeugswetter
Date:
Subject: Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong !
Next
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong !