Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication
Date
Msg-id 199806042346.TAA05819@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] some more rambling on the new fe/be communication  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> As far as the TCP protocol is concerned, yes.  A lot of libraries that
> you might want to use do not have an API that accounts for the separate
> "OOB" channel within one TCP connection, so it may be difficult or
> impossible to get at TCP's OOB facility from within a particular
> programming environment.  But that's not exactly a cross-environment
> compatibility problem, it's just a missing feature in a library API.
> Any two implementations that both handle OOB should be able to
> communicate.

Looks like we will be removing OOB in favor of a CANCEL cookie sent to
the postmaster.  I will work up something soon.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris Olivier
Date:
Subject: (no subject)
Next
From: fue48@hk.super.net (USA Publishing Co.)
Date:
Subject: Wanted Home Product Assemblers