Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Date
Msg-id 199804170412.AAA08546@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > How about an elog(NOTICE,"...") so it runs, but they see the NOTICE
> > every time.
>
>     That works too...but how does something like that work from within
> a C program?  Or Perl?

I have disabled HAVING completely, and removed it from the features
list.  I think we have enough bug reports on it that allowing people to
use it is really not going to give us any additional bug-fixing
information.

We can always release a 6.3.2 patch that will enable it when we have it
working 100%.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver
Next
From: "SC Altex Impex SRL"
Date:
Subject: lock failed and buffer leak