Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Date
Msg-id 199804161456.KAA20783@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > Do we disable it?
> > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
>
> Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> questions list...

We could do a elog(NOTICE,...) and have a small patch to fix all the
issues once we have a final fix.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: recursive views
Next
From: "Pedro J. Lobo"
Date:
Subject: Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix