Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hal Snyder
Subject Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?
Date
Msg-id 199803120404.WAA27649@crocodile.vail
Whole thread Raw
In response to port/getrusage.c?  (t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> From: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:13:54 +0900

> Does anybody know why getrusage() in backend/port/getrusage.c is
> removed (surrounded by #if 0)?
>
> Some ports including Solaris 2.4, NEWS OS 6 (I'm trying now) etc. need
> getrusage().

I have the same question - have been wrestling with the SCO (ODT 5)
port. Actually all we need here is client-side pgsql code to run on
SCO so I butchered my way thru the build to make it happen.

Used gcc-2.8.1 to get past the monster macro - altho if there's C
code we can put in for easily confused compilers it would be nice to
have a port buildable with SCO native tools. Bruce?

Additions to wishlist - client-only builds, fix setup so Pg.pm builds
on first install.

Will be happy to work with the experts on SCO port + these small
items - my hat is off to the 6.3 team.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris Albertson
Date:
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?