Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!
Date
Msg-id 199803100405.XAA13555@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!  (Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Heh, the disappearing problem!  (Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I've seen this same kind of behavior in a few other places as well; in
> places where you are doing reads and writes in a mixed environment (ie: read
> something, write something (typically in a different table) based on what
> you read) performance of 6.3 has gone in the toilet.  Update jobs that used
> to run in tens of seconds are requiring several minutes to complete now.
>
> And again, we're not seeing much disk I/O during this period - but we *ARE*
> seeing a hell of a lot of CPU activity, almost all in user mode.

OK, how about using postgres -t option or profiling to get the function
using so much cpu?  This may help us tell where the problem lies.  Does
anyone else see such problems?  All other reports I hear was that 6.3
was faster.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Heh heh, who broke pg_dump?
Next
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: postgres/alpha problems